JBRMR
Online ISSN 2056-6271 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 13 Issue 02

The influence of selected demographic variables on the triple bottom line reporting of businesses in the Nelson Mandela Bay

Published: 07 Dec 2018 Issue:Volume 13 Issue 02 Dec 2018 Author details below

Tony Matchaba-Hove

Nelson Mandela University, South Africa

Xolile Antoni

Nelson Mandela University, South Africa

Elroy Smith

Nelson Mandela University, South Africa

Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
PDF file referenced for this article is missing from server storage.
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement
Views 606163
Downloads 105
Citations 0
Engagement 606268

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

          Triple bottom line reporting is an important aspect of a business’s sustainability efforts. The compilation of these reports allows the stakeholders of a business to assess the impact that it has on the economy, society, and environment. This increased stakeholder scrutiny of triple bottom line reports has led businesses that report on the triple bottom line to gain a competitive advantage through increased levels of trust and loyalty from their stakeholders. Other benefits of triple bottom line reporting include employee satisfaction and the minimisation of risk through ethical conduct. The purpose of this article was to investigate the influence of selected demographic variables on the triple bottom line reporting of businesses in the Nelson Mandela Bay region. A quantitative approach was implemented, and a self-administered questionnaire was distributed to the respondents. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated to assess the validity and reliability of the measuring instrument. The empirical results showed that some demographic variables – the size of the business, the industry in which the business operates, and the management style of the business – had a significant influence on the business’s triple bottom line reporting.

Article History

Published 07 Dec 2018

How to Cite

Matchaba-hove, T., Antoni, X., & Smith, E.. (2018). The influence of selected demographic variables on the triple bottom line reporting of businesses in the Nelson Mandela Bay. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 50 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Matchaba-hove, T., Antoni, X., & Smith, E.. (2018). The influence of selected demographic variables on the triple bottom line reporting of businesses in the Nelson Mandela Bay. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02.

MLA

Matchaba-hove, Tony, et al.. "The influence of selected demographic variables on the triple bottom line reporting of businesses in the Nelson Mandela Bay." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02, 2018.

Chicago

Tony Matchaba-hove, Xolile Antoni, and Elroy Smith. "The influence of selected demographic variables on the triple bottom line reporting of businesses in the Nelson Mandela Bay." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research Volume 13 Issue 02 (07 Dec 2018).

Harvard

Matchaba-hove, T., Antoni, X., & Smith, E. (2018) The influence of selected demographic variables on the triple bottom line reporting of businesses in the Nelson Mandela Bay. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02

References

  1. Babbie, E.R. (2010). The practice of social research. 12th edition. Belton CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  2. Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research, Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
  3. Bajpai, N. (2010). Business Statistics. India: Dorling Kindersley.
  4. Blowfield, M. & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A critical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 
  5. Bosch, J.K., Tait, M. & Venter, E. (2018). Business management: An entrepreneurial perspective. 3rd edition. Port Elizabeth: Lectern.
  6. Burmeister, E. & Aitken, L.M. (2012). Sample size: How many is enough? Australian Critical Care, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp.271-274.
  7. Chapman, R. & Milne, J.M. (2003). The triple bottom line: How New Zealand companies measure up. New Zealand: University of Otago. 
  8. Collins, E., Roper, J. & Lawrence. (2010). Sustainability practices: Trends in New Zealand businesses. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 19, No. 8, pp.479-494.
  9. Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2008). Business research methods. 10th edition. New York.
  10. Correia, C., Flynn, D., Uliana, E., Wormald, M. & Dillon, J. (2015). Financial management. 8th edition. Cape Town: Juta.
  11. David, M. & Sutton, C.D. (2004). Social research: The basics. London: SAGE Publications.
  12. Dutta, S. (2012). Triple bottom line reporting: An Indian perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp.652-659.
  13. Ekwueme, C. M. Egbunike, C. F. & Onyali, C. I. (2013). Benefits of triple bottom line disclosures on corporate performance: An exploratory study of corporate stakeholders. Journal of Management and Sustainability, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.79-91.
  14. Fifka, M.S., & Meyer, J. (2013). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective: A review of empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.1-35.
  15. Gimenez, C., Seirra, V. & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal Production Economics, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp.149-159.
  16. Goel, P. (2010). Triple bottom line: An analytical approach for corporate sustainability. Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, Vol. 1, No.  1, pp.27-42.
  17. Gomes, C. M., Kneipp, J.M., Kruglianskas Rosa, L.A.B. & Bichueti, R.S. (2015). Management for sustainability: An analysis of key practices according to the business size. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp.116-125. 
  18. Gray, R. & Milne, M.J. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Who’s kidding whom? New Zealand: University of Otago.
  19. Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J., Jackson, S.E., Louw, L., Staude, G., Amos, T., Klopper, H.B., Louw, M., Oosthuizein, T., Perks, S. & Zinyide, S. (2012). Management. 4th edition. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
  20. Hindle, T. (2009). Triple bottom line. [Online] Available: http://www.economist.com/node/14301663 [Accessed 12 April 2013].
  21. Ho, L.J. & Taylor, M.E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.123-150. 
  22. Jackson, A., Boswell, K. & Davis, D. (2011). Sustainability and triple bottom line reporting – What is it all about? International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.55-59.
  23. Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organisation perspective. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp.809-821.
  24. Keller, G. & Warrack, B. (2003). Statistics for management and economics. 6th edition. California: Thomson-Brooks/Cole.
  25. Lehman, A. (2005). JMP for basic univariate and multivariate statistics: A step-by-step guide. London: SAGE Publications.
  26. Millar, H. & Russell, S. (2011). The adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in the Caribbean. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp.512-526.
  27. Milne, J.M., Tregidga, H. & Walton, S. (2003). The triple-bottom-line: Benchmarking New Zealand’s early reporters. New Zealand: University of Otago.
  28. Naudé, J.A. (2008). A framework for reporting sustainability performance to major stakeholders group. Doctoral thesis. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
  29. Nemli, E. (2004). The status of corporate sustainability in Turkish companies. [Online] Available: 
  30. http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/gc/philadelphia/abstract/ Nemli.pdf [Accessed 30 March 2013].
  31. Ng, E.S. & Burke, R.J. (2010). Predictor of business students’ attitudes towards sustainability business practices. Springer, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp.603-615.
  32. Norman, W. & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.243-262.
  33. Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw. 
  34. Orlitzky, M. (2000). Corporate social performance: Developing effective strategies. Sydney: Centre for Corporate Change.
  35. Reddy, R. (2007). Guidelines to evaluate social performance. Microfinance Gateway.Washington: Accion Publishers. 
  36. Rogers, M. (2001). The triple bottom line for sustainable community development. Local Environment, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp.279-289.
  37. Savitz, A.W. & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom lines. [Online] Available: http://www.amazon.com/The-Triple-Bottom-Line-Environmental/product-reviews/0787979074. [Accessed 12 April 2013].
  38. Simerly, R.L. (2003). An empirical examination of the relationship between management and corporate social performance. International Journal of Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.148-155.
  39. Slaper, T.F. & Hall, T.J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What it is and how it works? Indiana Business Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp.4-8.
  40. Sotorrío, L.L. & Sánchez, J.F. (2010). Corporate social reporting for different audiences: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp.272-283.
  41. Sridhar, K. (2011). A multi-dimensional criticism of the triple bottom line reporting approach. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.49-67. 
  42. Sustainability Reporting Program. (2000). A brief history of sustainable development. Available: 
  43. http://www.sustreport.org [Accessed 31 March 2011].
  44. Swallow, L. (2009). Green business practices for dummies. New Jersey: Wiley.
  45. The Business Leaders. (2009). Draft code of governance principles for South Africa – 2009: King Committee on Governance. South Africa: Institute of Directors in Southern Africa.
  46. The New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2012). Aspects of sustainability. New Zealand curriculum guides: Senior Secondary. [Online]. Available: 
  47. http://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/Social-sciences/Education-for-sustainability/Key-concepts/Aspects-of-sustainability [Accessed 5 April 2013].
  48. Thomas, J., Nelson, J.K. & Silverman, S. (2010). Research methods in physical activity. 6th edition. New York: Thompson Shore.
  49. Wilson, M. (2003). Corporate sustainability: What is it and where does it come from? Ivey Business Journal, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp.1-5.
  50. Yilmaz, A.K. & Flouris, T. (2010). Managing corporate sustainability: Risk management process based perspective. African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.162-171.

Related Articles

Managerial perceptions of corporate sustainability reporting determinants in Nigeria

Browse Articles

Failure demand – how part of the total demand can become a burden
AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management
Understanding the impact of reward and recognition, work life balance, on employee retention with job satisfaction as mediating variable on millennials in Indonesia
Organizational culture and job satisfaction: a study Of organized retail sector
How to win back the disgruntled consumer? The omni-channel way
Retail turnover clauses in an online world
Brand awareness of 'generation y' customers towards doughnut retail outlets in India
Failure demand – how part of the total demand can become a burden
AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management