Determinants of collaboration and innovation towards organization performance within Thailand's automotive parts industry
Article Metrics Report
Views, downloads, citations, engagementCited by
Current citation countResearch summary
The objective of this study is to examine the collaboration and innovation influencing the organization performance of Thailand’s automotive parts industry. Thailand’s continuing economic growth has been partly attributed to the export automotive production industry that has also established Thailand as the automotive parts production base for ASEAN. Both industries have evolved into Thailand’s key industries with the largest export values. Quantitative research method was employed to study 250 automotive parts entrepreneurs in Thailand. Questionnaires were used to collect data and SEM statistical modeling technique was used in the data analysis. The research found that organizations with significant emphasis on supplier, internal and customer collaboration to be able to create product, process, service and organization innovation that had significant impacts on the organization performance of Thailand’s automotive parts industry regarding customer retention, employee satisfaction, cost reduction and organization growth.
Article History
How to Cite
Sueptaetrakun, W. & Sorasaktangthong. (2018). Determinants of collaboration and innovation towards organization performance within Thailand's automotive parts industry. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02.
Citation Context
APA
Sueptaetrakun, W. & Sorasaktangthong. (2018). Determinants of collaboration and innovation towards organization performance within Thailand's automotive parts industry. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02.
MLA
Sueptaetrakun, Winit, and Sorasaktangthong. "Determinants of collaboration and innovation towards organization performance within Thailand's automotive parts industry." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02, 2018.
Chicago
Winit Sueptaetrakun and Sorasaktangthong. "Determinants of collaboration and innovation towards organization performance within Thailand's automotive parts industry." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research Volume 13 Issue 02 (07 Dec 2018).
Harvard
Sueptaetrakun, W. & Sorasaktangthong (2018) Determinants of collaboration and innovation towards organization performance within Thailand's automotive parts industry. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 13 Issue 02
References
- Aron O'Cass and Liem Viet Ngo. 2012, “Creating superior customer value for B2B firms through supplier firm capabilities”, Industrial Marketing Management, 41, pp.125–135.
- Bilton, C., & Cummings, S. 2009, Creative strategy: From innovation to sustainable advantage, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- BOI. 2015, Thailand: Global Green Automotive Production Base, Retrieved January 15, 2016, from
- http://aseanup.com/thailand-automotive-industry-overview/
- Cheung, M., Myers, M. B., & Mentzer, J. T. 2010, “Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross-national supply chain investigation”, Journal of Operations Management, 28(6), pp.472–487.
- Cristina Sancha, Cristina Gimenez, Vicenta Sierra. 2016, “Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp.1934-1947.
- Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez, Raquel Sanz-Valle. 2011, “Innovation, organizational learning, and performance”, Journal of Business Research, 64, pp.408–417.
- Derya Findik and Berna Beyhan. 2015, “The Impact of External Collaborations on Firm Innovation Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, pp.1425 – 1434.
- Endang Chumaidiyah. 2012, “The Technology, Technical Skill, and R&D Capability in Increasing Profitability on Indonesia Telecommunication Services Companies”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, pp.110 – 119.
- Faems, D., Van Looy, B. & Debackere, K. 2005, “Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, pp.238-250.
- Fitjar, R.D., Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2013, “Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway”, Res. Policy, 42, pp.128–138.
- Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., Rodon, J. 2012, “Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line”, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 140, pp.149-159.
- Gualandris, J., Golini, R., Kalchschmidt, M. 2014, “Do supply management and global sourcing matter for firm sustainability performance?”, Int. Study. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J., 19(3), pp.258-274.
- Gupta, S., &Polonsky, M. 2014, “Interfirm learning and knowledge-sharing in multinational networks: An outsourced organization's perspective” Journal of Business Research, 67(4), pp.615–622.
- Hair, J.F., Black W.C. Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.I. 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Ilker Murat Ar and BirdoganBaki. 2011, “Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation: Empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology park”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2), pp.172–206.
- Jia-Sheng Lee. 2010, “A research in relating entrepreneurship, marketing capability, innovation capability and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Business Economics Research- September 8(9), pp.109-119.
- K. Grekova, R.J. Calantone, H.J. Bremmers, J.H. Trienekens, S.W.F. Omta. 2016, “How environmental collaboration with suppliers and customers influences firm performance: evidence from Dutch food and beverage processors”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp.1861-1871.
- K.N. Krishnaswamy, M. Mathirajan, M.H. BalaSubrahmanya. 2014, “Technological innovations and its influence on the growth of auto component SMEs of Bangalore: A case study approach” Technology in Society, 38, pp.18–31.
- Kuen-Hung Tsai, Teresa Tiaojung Hsu. 2014, “Cross-Functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: A mediated moderation model”, Industrial Marketing Management, 43, pp.293–303.
- Lahiri, S., Kedia, B.L., Mukherjee, D. 2012), “The impact of management capability on the resource–performance linkage: examining Indian outsourcing providers”, Journal of World Business, 47(1), pp.145–155.
- Likert, R. 1972, Likert Technique for Attitude Measurement. In: Social Psychology: Experimentation, Theory, Research, Sahakian, W.S. (Ed.). Intext Educational Publishers, Scranton, USA., ISBN-13: 9780700223879, pp.101-119.
- Ma Ding. 2014, “Supply Chain Collaboration toward Eco-innovation: an SEM Analysis of the Inner Mechanism”, IEEE, pp.129-134.
- Michael E. Porter. 1985, Competitive Advantage Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York, The Free Press.
- MubeyyenTepeKucukoglu, R. Ibrahim Pinar. 2015, “Positive Influences of Green Innovation on Company Performance”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, pp.1232 – 1237.
- O'Cass, A., & Ngo, L. V. 2011, “Examining the Firm's Value Creation Process: A Managerial Perspective of the Firm's Value Offering Strategy and Performance”, British Journal of Management, 22(4), pp.646–671.
- OICA. 2015 Production Statistics. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from http://www.oica.net/category/production-statistics/2015-statistics/
- Parasuraman, A. 2010, “Service productivity, quality and innovation: Implications for service-design practice and research”, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2, pp.277–286.
- Prahalad, C. K., &Ramaswamy, V. 2000, “Co-opting customer competence”, Harvard Business Review, 78, pp.79–87.
- Patrick HenryIbeogu and Ali Ozturen. 2015, “Perception of Justice in Performance Appraisal and Effect on Satisfaction: Empirical Findings from Northern Cyprus Banks”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, pp.964 – 969.
- PWC. 2013, Automobiles: The economic outlook and employment situation. Retrieved January 10, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/nopovcr.
- Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton. 1996, “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System”, Harvard Business Review (January-February 1996), 76.
- Rogers, E.M. 2003, Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. The Free Press. New York. NY.
- Rune Dahl Fitjar, Andrés Rodríguez-Pose. 2013, “Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway”, Research Policy, 42, pp.128– 138.
- Sadikoglu, E., &Zehir, C. 2010, “Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms”, International Journal of Production Economics, 127, pp.13–26.
- Schøtt, T., Sedaghat, M. 2014, “Innovation embedded in entrepreneurs’ networks and national educational systems: a global study”, Small Bus. Econ, 43(2), pp.463–476.
- Schumacker, R.E. and R.G. Lomax. 2010, A Beginners Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New York, Routledge. ISBN-13: 9781841698915.
- Singh, J. 2008, “Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output”, Research Policy, 37, pp.77–96.
- Sriram Narayanan, Ram Narasimhan, Tobias Schoenherr. 2015, “Assessing the contingent effects of collaboration on agility performance in buyer–supplier relationships”, Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, pp.140–154.
- Tether, B. 2002, “Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis”, Res. Policy, 31, pp.947–967.
- TAI. 2016, Master Plan for Automotive Industry 2012 – 2016. Ministry of Industry, Retrieved September 3, 2016, from http://tinyurl.com/o6cs4xs
- Thomas Schøtt and Kent Wickstrøm Jensen. 2016, “Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects”, Research Policy, 45, pp.1233–1246.
- Un, C.A., & Asakawa, K. 2015, “Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, pp.138-153.
- Wawan Dhewant, Eko Agus Prasetio, Sudrajati Ratnaningtyas, Sri Herliana, Rendra Chaerudin, QorriAina, R. Bayuningrat H., EvyRachmawaty. 2012, “Moderating Effect of Cluster on Firm’s Innovation Capability and Business Performance: A Conceptual Framework”, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, pp.867 – 872