JBRMR
Online ISSN 2056-6271 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 10 Issue 1

International management: A conceptual framework for comparison of offshoring and outsourcing strategies by UK and German multinational corporations

Published: 04 Nov 2015 Issue:Volume 10 Issue 1 Oct 2015 Author details below

Anthony Mitchell

Ashridge Executive Education Hult International Business School

Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
PDF file referenced for this article is missing from server storage.
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement
Views 559723
Downloads 37
Citations 0
Engagement 559760

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

This paper outlines research exploring differences in approach to outsourcing and offshoring by multinational corporations. In particular, a comparison is drawn between German and UK headquartered organizations in the airline / transport and also the engineering sectors. A novel conceptual framework is developed that uses differing varieties of capitalism (VoC) to compare and contrast a series of criteria. Underlying theory that is drawn from the resource based view (RBV) of the firm and global production networks (GPNs) are also considered. The initial findings from two case studies are that German organizations are less inclined to outsource (in both sectors) preferring to retain control as a wholly owned business offshore. The UK businesses were less risk adverse and seemed to be more flexible and agile in their sourcing policies being prepared to outsource, offshore and partner or acquire as appropriate, even using competitors when there is a sound business case. The relationships’ with trade unions / works council was also found to be very different, with reluctance by management in Germany to progress radical initiatives. A favorable economy in Germany has also created an environment in which overseas expansion could take place without a significant loss of jobs at home.

Article History

Published 04 Nov 2015

How to Cite

Mitchell, A.. (2015). International management: A conceptual framework for comparison of offshoring and outsourcing strategies by UK and German multinational corporations. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 1.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 25 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Mitchell, A.. (2015). International management: A conceptual framework for comparison of offshoring and outsourcing strategies by UK and German multinational corporations. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 1.

MLA

Mitchell, Anthony. "International management: A conceptual framework for comparison of offshoring and outsourcing strategies by UK and German multinational corporations." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 1, 2015.

Chicago

Anthony Mitchell. "International management: A conceptual framework for comparison of offshoring and outsourcing strategies by UK and German multinational corporations." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research Volume 10 Issue 1 (04 Nov 2015).

Harvard

Mitchell, A. (2015) International management: A conceptual framework for comparison of offshoring and outsourcing strategies by UK and German multinational corporations. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 1

References

  1. Banker, R.D. et al (1984) Estimating the most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research (July), 35-44
  2. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
  3. Coe, N.M., Hess, M. et al (2004) Globalizing regional development: a global production networks perspective Trans Inst British Geographers 29 (4): 468-484
  4. Contractor, F.J. et al (2010). Reconceptualizing the Firm in a World of Outsourcing and Offshoring: The Organizational and Geographical Relocation of High-Value Company Functions, Journal of Management Studies 47:8 December
  5. Contractor, F.J. (2012). Why do Multinational Firms exist? A theory note about the effect of multinational expansion on performance and recent methodological critiques. Global Strategy Journal 2, 318-331, Wiley.
  6. Costello, A.E. & Costello, T.G. (2004). ‘Corporate Governance in Multinational Corporations’.    Working Paper, Eastern Illinois University, School of Business. Unpublished.
  7. Dunning, J. H. (1988). Explaining International Production. London: Unwin Hyman.
  8. Economist (2011), Business, multinational manufacturers, May 14th, pg. 73
  9. Financial Times, 2011, Editor’s Choice, feature on Offshoring by Prof Jérôme Barthélemy, Essec Business School, May 26th
  10. Financial Times (2013). ’Data show yawning productivity gap between UK and G7 peers’. O’Connor, S. September 18.
  11. Hall, P. & Soskice, D. (2001).’ Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundation of Comparative Advantage’. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  12. Harms, Lorz & Urban, (2009). Offshoring along the Production Chain. CESIfo Working Paper 2564.
  13. Kirkegaard, J.F. (2008). Offshoring, Outsourcing and Production Relocations—Labour Market Effects In The OECD and Developing Asia, The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 371–418
  14. Lane, C. (2008). ‘National Capitalisms and global production networks: an analysis of their interaction in two global industries’. Socio-Economic Review. Vol (6) pp 227-260.
  15. Lane, C. & Probert, J. (2009).’ National Capitalisms, Global Production Networks Fashioning the Value Chain in the UK, USA and Germany’. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  16. Lynn, L. & Salzman, H. (2009).  ‘The new globalization of Engineering: How offshoring of advanced engineering affects competitiveness and development’. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 4, 1.  March. Addleton, New York.
  17. McKinsey (2012). Manufacturing the future: The next era of global growth and innovation. McKinsey Global Institute and McKinsey Operations Practice, November.
  18. Mitchell, A.J. & Hill, S. (2004) The Great M&A Gamble, The Ashridge Journal 360°, Autumn
  19. Morgan, G., Whitley, R. & Moen, E. (2006). ‘Changing Capitalisms? Complementarities, Contradictions and Capability Development in an International Context’, pp78-109, Oxford University Press, Oxford
  20. Mudambi, R. & Venzin, M. (2010). The Strategic Nexus of Offshoring and Outsourcing Decisions, Journal of Management Studies 47:8 December
  21. Pisano, G. (2009)’ Restoring American Competitiveness’, Harvard Business Review, July-August.
  22. Reichertz, J. (2004). Abduction, Deduction and Induction in Qualitative Research. In: Flick, Uwe (ed.): A companion to qualitative research, London: Sage, pp. 159 – 164.
  23. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012). ‘Research Methods for Business Students’. (6th edition). Harlow: Pearson.
  24. Trompenaars, F. (1997), 2nd edition) Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, London: Nichols Brealey.
  25. Whitley, R. & Kristensen, P. H. (Eds) (1997). ‘Governance at Work: The Social Regulation of Economic Relations’. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Related Articles

Browse Articles

Failure demand – how part of the total demand can become a burden
AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management
Understanding the impact of reward and recognition, work life balance, on employee retention with job satisfaction as mediating variable on millennials in Indonesia
Organizational culture and job satisfaction: a study Of organized retail sector
How to win back the disgruntled consumer? The omni-channel way
Retail turnover clauses in an online world
Brand awareness of 'generation y' customers towards doughnut retail outlets in India
Failure demand – how part of the total demand can become a burden
AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management