JBRMR
Online ISSN 2056-6271 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 05 Issue 2

Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility and Business Ethics

Published: 24 Feb 2012 Issue:Volume 05 Issue 2 Apr 2011 Author details below

S. S. Aggarwal

Bihani S. D. P. G. College

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

Corporate governance has shifted from its focus on agency conflicts to address issues of ethics, accountability, transparency, and disclosure. Moreover, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has increasingly focused on corporate governance as a vehicle for incorporating social and environmental concerns into the business decision-making process, benefiting not only financial investors but also employees, consumers, and communities. Currently, corporate governance is being linked more and more with business practices and public policies that are stakeholder-friendly. This study concurs with research findings from the extant literature that good practice in corporate governance, social responsibility and business ethics. This article examines these developments and their impact on the formulation of a hybridized body of business legal norms by proceeding in three stages: First, the article explores the recent transformations in the regulation of corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and ethics. Second, it reads these transformations as a convergence that encompasses both corporate self-regulation and the efforts by various social groups to make it more effective. Third, the article discusses the prospects and challenges of this convergence by outlining a series of conceptual and methodological inquiries as well as policy ramifications to be pursued by scholars and practitioners in the field of law and corporate conduct.

Article History

Published 24 Feb 2012

How to Cite

Aggarwal, S. S.. (2012). Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 05 Issue 2.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 26 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Aggarwal, S. S.. (2012). Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 05 Issue 2.

MLA

Aggarwal, S. S.. "Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility and Business Ethics." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 05 Issue 2, 2012.

Chicago

S. S. Aggarwal. "Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility and Business Ethics." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research Volume 05 Issue 2 (24 Feb 2012).

Harvard

Aggarwal, S. S. (2012) Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 05 Issue 2

References

  1. Aktiespararna’s Corporate Governance Policy, Guidelines for Better Control and   Transparency for Stockholders in Stock Market Companies, Sveriges Aktiespararna’s Ruksforbund, March 1993,
  2. Borokhovich, K. A., R. Parrino, and T. Trapani, 1996, “Outside Directors and CEO
  3. Selection,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 337-355.
  4. Brazilian Institute of Corporate Directors, Brazilian Code of Best Practices, preliminary proposal, April 1999,
  5. Brickley, J. A., J. L. Coles, and R. L. Terry, 1987, “The Takeover Market, Corporate
  6. Board Composition, and Ownership Structure: The Case of Banking,” Journal of Law and Economics, 30, 161-180.
  7. Cardon Report of the Belgium Commission on Corporate Governance, Brussels Stock Exchange, June 1998, http://www.calpers governance.org/principles/international/other.asp.Código de mejores práticas, June 1999, 
  8. Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker, 1999, “Corporate Governance, CEO
  9. Compensation, and Firm Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371-406.
  10. Draft Report of the Kumar Mangalam Committee on Corporate Governance,
  11. Confederation of Indian Industry Report on Desirable Corporate Governance – A Code, April 1998, http://www.ecgn.org/ecgn/docs/codes/india-corpgovern.html.
  12. Gilson, S., 1989, “Management Turnover and Financial Distress,” Journal of Financial Economics, 25, 241-262.
  13. Hermalin, B., and M. Weisbach, 1998, “Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO,” American Economic Review, 88, 96-118.
  14. High Level Finance Committee on Corporate Governance, Report on Malaysian Corporate Governance, March 1999,.
  15. Handbook for Issuers on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange, Corporate Governance inDenmark, December 2001.
  16. Huson, M., R. Parrino, and L. T. Starks, 1998, “Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and
  17. CEO Turnover: A Long Term Perspective,” working paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
  18. Kang, J., and A. Shivdasani, 1995, “Firm Performance, Corporate Governance, and Top Executive Turnover in Japan,” Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 29-58.
  19. Lee, C. I., S. Rosenstein, N. Rangan, and W. N. Davidson III, 1992, “Board Composition and Shareholder Wealth: The Case of Management Buyouts,” Financial Management, 21, 58-72.
  20. Martin, K., and J. J. McConnell, 1991, “Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeovers, and Top Management Turnover,” Journal of Finance, 46, 671-687.
  21. Murphy, K. J., and J. L. Zimmerman, 1993, “Financial Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 273-315.
  22. Parrino, R., 1997, “CEO Turnover and Outside Succession: A Cross-Sectional Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 46, 165-197.
  23. Shivdasani, A., 1993 “Board Composition, Ownership Structure, and Hostile Takeovers,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 167-198.
  24. Vienot II report on the boards of directors of listed companies in France, Mouvement des Enterprises de France (MEDEF) and Association Francaise des Enterprises Privees (AFEF), July 1999,
  25. Wahal, S., K. W. Wiles, and M. Zenner, 1995, “Who Opts Out of Antitakeover Protection? The Case of Pennsylvanian’s SB 1310,” Financial Management, 24, 22 39
  26. Warner, J. B., R. L. Watts, and K. H. Wruck, 1988, “Stock Prices and Top Management Changes,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 461-492.
     

Related Articles

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and consumer purchase intention in the UK fashion industry
Image management and competitive advantage of manufacturing firms in South-East, Nigeria
The influence of sustainable development goals (SDGs) on customer-based store equity (CBSE)
Corporate Governance Practices in the Banking and Finance Sector: Perspectives from Bangladesh

Browse Articles

AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management
Nexus between sustainable brand equity and behavioural outcomes: The moderating role of age
Understanding the impact of reward and recognition, work life balance, on employee retention with job satisfaction as mediating variable on millennials in Indonesia
Organizational culture and job satisfaction: a study Of organized retail sector
Retail turnover clauses in an online world
How to win back the disgruntled consumer? The omni-channel way
Brand awareness of 'generation y' customers towards doughnut retail outlets in India
AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management
Nexus between sustainable brand equity and behavioural outcomes: The moderating role of age